Conscious Mind: Subject, Object, or Suspect?

  You would think I was losing my mind if I told you I just saw Moses and Einstein approaching Jesus with a straight jacket...And on my way home there were a bunch of strange Neanderthal looking dudes holding a wooden cross in the middle of the road arguing with one another about which way to go! 
   One biblical character, one scientific genius, and a group of ancestoral/primitive inhabitants in part with life, love, and living! As if it's necessary to explain who these non-fictitious characters of development in society are...As if they don't intervene with our lives spiritually on a daily basis.
   * Why is the centrality of the relational so easy to miss, to forget about, to relegate to the conceptual background? It must have something to do with the "confusion of minds" with the ways in which bodies operate as functional units.
   Subjectivity and objectivity play major roles in our consciousness. 
   Subjectivity: sub·jec·tive (s b-j k t v). adj. 1. a. Proceeding from or taking place in a person's mind rather than the external world: refers to a person's perspective or opinion, particular feelings, beliefs, and desires. It is often used casually to refer to unsubstantiated personal opinions, in contrast to knowledge and fact-based beliefs.
   Objectivity: is both a central and elusive concept in philosophy. While there is no universally accepted articulation of objectivity, a proposition is generally considered to be objectively true when its truth conditions are "mind-independent"—that is, not the result of any judgments made by a conscious entity. Objective truths are those which are discovered rather than created.
   In today's world we are so purpose driven that we oftentimes fail to recognize another purpose. Purpose serves us intentionally. Without purpose, what would our intentions be? If we only had spiritual guidance with no scientific reasoning, would we be satisfied? Our hunger for knowledge exists. The knowledge we seek tends to exist, or what would it be we're seeking? What exists under a table with a cloth over isn't exposed to all that see the table from afar. What's under the table could be empty space or objects consuming the space we are unaware of. With perspective there should be some way to relate to what's depicted through the eyes of anyone with the position to access what the human eye can relate to or see. Sometimes we have a way of seeing with more than our eyeballs. When we live spiritually or consciously the image we pick up with the physical eyeball is sometimes far from what we can see in our minds or with our hearts. Sometimes when we encounter text there is no physical image besides the symbols that represent letters that create the terms, but there is usually an image created in our minds to serve purpose in life, love, living or in our hearts even. 
     The spirit in which we were created is the spirit in which there is life; life in conception, life in perception, and life in deception. Sounds a lot like the world we all know today. Some of the functions of religion seem to be distorted to realists, skeptics, and spiritualists as if the purpose or objective is generally accepted before our intentions or true spiritual presence is even recognized. Is it even possible to function in spirituality without a connection with a particular sect or functional unit? Do you have a life without a universal recognition of the particular spiritual connection you function in? Is it all love; you know our relationship with Allah "the greatest," Yahweh (Jehova) "the most high," Jesus Christ "our lord and savior," or Self "the greatest common factor relative to all purpose in functionality?"

Sex: Is there a double standard for women?

A woman can love sex just as much as the next person , the conflict usually arises when sex and and the universal bond between men and women don't require the integral/mutual respect for self, others, friends, or even family! If the process to having sex was nurtured before hand most of the time, there would be less altercation and misunderstanding of one another's point and purpose in the whole otherwise promiscuous liaison! Whether or not your genitalia functions doesn't make you a man or a woman, it does justify means of reproduction often misplaced in ones spirit as far as what you may or may not hold as the highest of principle/fundamental standards in your heart. Recreational, therapeutic, occupational, and monogamous sex all seem have their place in society! It's probably best to recognize and sort your particular needs before hand and responsibly share them with your soon to be or current partner/partners or even friends and family for that matter to keep clear with those in your life the particular standards or lifestyle structure that fits your particular physical, emotional, or occupational, or monogamous needs/requirements. I think it hardly matters whether your a man or a women, but whether or not you know what your doing if at one point or another your in complete control of your actions as a responsibly mature individual!