Showing posts with label Development. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Development. Show all posts
Thursday, February 3, 2011
Bridges of Religious
Religious views must be respected; not necessarily individuals of different religious denominations, but the views and base origin of differing spiritual sects are historical, besides they are pillars of our livelihood... They are the greatest sources of light known to mankind, if you concentrate hard enough... You can tell that some of us don't see the importance of practicing what's right or relatively correct; we only feel like when we hear or speak in parables, that we're headed in the right direction... Contrary to popular belief, your'e only as close to the divine nature in spirituality as you are "willing" to go... There are many ways of life, and some don't truly correspond with the ways of GOD and His central focus for developing character in an otherwise civilization of a greater consciousness. What ALL religions have in common is a primitive order for living, growing, and coming together, which is the most important feature of any process of communication and education.
Once we all gain respect for at least attempting to learn and love, we can appreciate the process more and put what energy we posses in the right place(depending on where your heart is), instead of judging others about how they go about receiving the WORD & the WILL of the greatest light in consciousness.
Judgement is normal, and is in all of us, we are the only judges to give light to truth and render it's validity in value of our character and divine spirit... So if you feel close to any of the word of wisdom, HOLD FAST to what creation in light does it best for YOU... "Man was the WORD...The word was flesh ...The word was God! WU
"There is no argument for ignorance or prejudice like the one we cultivate as we separate or harbor evils of difference/indifference within the spirit." Munzo Capone
Labels:
appeal,
business,
Church,
communication,
concern,
confusion,
conscious,
Development,
environment,
faith,
growth,
humanity,
Influence,
insight,
practice,
religion,
spirit,
truth,
value,
well being
Thursday, January 20, 2011
ABORTION; When is it ok to say when?
First of all; the matter is so sensitive, that a civilization of people that has barely "come together" for any point of character judgment, political correctness, or "a code ethics" in general is hardly able to discuss conscious matters from such diverse and altogether incoherent in nature/tribal order alongside one another.
We barely agree that we disagree, moreover we only do that to establish superficial/universal order as we all learn as children of the greatest light known to our spiritual nature (GOD, Muhammad, The Most High).
Conception is as virtuous as the life that is potentially created; better yet, we've already killed as soon as the the idea of what is living is reconsidered! Given that; at what stage of life is it to impede on growth and development, because it only seems to be when we are officially registered with the Govt., even then is our presence so that we can be considered murdered/killed before we are given what we tend to call "LIFE?" To sum it up; the killing is a conscious matter that is far from the surface matter that we address the most.
I consider myself humanist for the sake of the decisions and faults that we have and generally accept as spiritual creatures that seem to have some type of mutual respect for common hood! As superficial beings, we've created a kingdom of ill nature and falsehood while attempting to communicate. We truly have life in that kingdom, until it's taken or terribly altered... Where are the social economists when kids that just created a life start thinking of bills they can't pay? Is it then time to consider why it is of a greater consciousness to abort? Who pays then? Us? Usually, so where do we begin to change our ways? WE KILL AT ANY STAGE OF LIFE AND ACCEPT IT WHETHER WE GET CAUGHT UP IN LEGALITIES OR NOT!
We barely agree that we disagree, moreover we only do that to establish superficial/universal order as we all learn as children of the greatest light known to our spiritual nature (GOD, Muhammad, The Most High).
Conception is as virtuous as the life that is potentially created; better yet, we've already killed as soon as the the idea of what is living is reconsidered! Given that; at what stage of life is it to impede on growth and development, because it only seems to be when we are officially registered with the Govt., even then is our presence so that we can be considered murdered/killed before we are given what we tend to call "LIFE?" To sum it up; the killing is a conscious matter that is far from the surface matter that we address the most.
I consider myself humanist for the sake of the decisions and faults that we have and generally accept as spiritual creatures that seem to have some type of mutual respect for common hood! As superficial beings, we've created a kingdom of ill nature and falsehood while attempting to communicate. We truly have life in that kingdom, until it's taken or terribly altered... Where are the social economists when kids that just created a life start thinking of bills they can't pay? Is it then time to consider why it is of a greater consciousness to abort? Who pays then? Us? Usually, so where do we begin to change our ways? WE KILL AT ANY STAGE OF LIFE AND ACCEPT IT WHETHER WE GET CAUGHT UP IN LEGALITIES OR NOT!
Labels:
communication,
concern,
confusion,
conscious,
consciousness,
Development,
existence,
faith,
growth,
humanity,
Influence,
insight,
integrity,
life,
living,
nature,
practice,
spirit,
Traditon,
value
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
Where's The Beef?
Why does everyone that didn't run or get elected for the office of President have the best damn plan ya ever did hear of for everythong??? I mean everything! Does one's persona have much to do with the functionality of Government? I think not! Someone had to be present in the spirit and interested to even get a look in this day and age, yet sooo many under developed citizens know the path, the journey, the truth even! Give the leaders the benefit of the doubt sometimes, and quit falling into the bogus and unorthodox gentile tempered melee that many of us find to be "CORRECTNESS," but is merely harsh criticism of the only system some have fought so hard to edify and thoroughly correct around the clock. Most of us it seems, are barely here with the generalities of order & the integrity of systematics. The rest of us are extremely satisfied that someone is in command, and could care less until the well-being of our lives is at risk. If there is a future for anyone on earth, it's most definitely the "people" who have the best plan for the "people's" well being. There is way too much campaign "PORK" and terminology war in politics to lose focus and forget the purpose for it all. What's new? If we don't find the best person for that position before I die, I think I've been shwimboozled! There is no "man" for the job! One man can't run the budget through the ceiling, and one man can't come up with a solution! If we're still on the same sh*t 3 presidents from now, as we've been on for the past few, somebody's screws are loose, and it seems to be the general population! Personally, I AM SICK OF THIS BOGUS BULLSH*T! Someone stop the bleeding please, It's out of control and completely unruly!
Sunday, December 27, 2009
Conscious Mind: Subject, Object, or Suspect?
One biblical character, one scientific genius, and a group of ancestoral/primitive inhabitants in part with life, love, and living! As if it's necessary to explain who these non-fictitious characters of development in society are...As if they don't intervene with our lives spiritually on a daily basis.
* Why is the centrality of the relational so easy to miss, to forget about, to relegate to the conceptual background? It must have something to do with the "confusion of minds" with the ways in which bodies operate as functional units.
Subjectivity and objectivity play major roles in our consciousness.
Subjectivity: sub·jec·tive (s b-j k t v). adj. 1. a. Proceeding from or taking place in a person's mind rather than the external world: refers to a person's perspective or opinion, particular feelings, beliefs, and desires. It is often used casually to refer to unsubstantiated personal opinions, in contrast to knowledge and fact-based beliefs.
Objectivity: is both a central and elusive concept in philosophy. While there is no universally accepted articulation of objectivity, a proposition is generally considered to be objectively true when its truth conditions are "mind-independent"—that is, not the result of any judgments made by a conscious entity. Objective truths are those which are discovered rather than created.
In today's world we are so purpose driven that we oftentimes fail to recognize another purpose. Purpose serves us intentionally. Without purpose, what would our intentions be? If we only had spiritual guidance with no scientific reasoning, would we be satisfied? Our hunger for knowledge exists. The knowledge we seek tends to exist, or what would it be we're seeking? What exists under a table with a cloth over isn't exposed to all that see the table from afar. What's under the table could be empty space or objects consuming the space we are unaware of. With perspective there should be some way to relate to what's depicted through the eyes of anyone with the position to access what the human eye can relate to or see. Sometimes we have a way of seeing with more than our eyeballs. When we live spiritually or consciously the image we pick up with the physical eyeball is sometimes far from what we can see in our minds or with our hearts. Sometimes when we encounter text there is no physical image besides the symbols that represent letters that create the terms, but there is usually an image created in our minds to serve purpose in life, love, living or in our hearts even.
The spirit in which we were created is the spirit in which there is life; life in conception, life in perception, and life in deception. Sounds a lot like the world we all know today. Some of the functions of religion seem to be distorted to realists, skeptics, and spiritualists as if the purpose or objective is generally accepted before our intentions or true spiritual presence is even recognized. Is it even possible to function in spirituality without a connection with a particular sect or functional unit? Do you have a life without a universal recognition of the particular spiritual connection you function in? Is it all love; you know our relationship with Allah "the greatest," Yahweh (Jehova) "the most high," Jesus Christ "our lord and savior," or Self "the greatest common factor relative to all purpose in functionality?"
Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Faith: Required or Acquired?
You have to see that whether you wholeheartedly as an individual have faith or not, the presence of our great lord remains in us...and if the individual doesn't recognize truth before all falsehood, the lord will...Truth and it's co-founder can enjoy and reap the benefits of its certainty in the presence of forces falsehood(what seems to be)...It's key that you balance yourself and recognize imbalances between falsehood as force and truth as guiding light for any and all intensive purpose, otherwise we could lose touch with our forces or even truth in/of reality for that matter...sometimes there is so much more to learn than what faith in an altogether divine relationship with one's self can bring to the surface...faith in what?... the sun, your heart, people in general, GOD's will? I myself have faith in micro-division, mutation, reproduction of cells and microorganisms, perpetual motion, etc....In/of that is the same light we see on a global scale when it comes to almost any matter..What iz the lord in all of that, and why is faith in what's for certain an issue?
Labels:
appeal,
consciousness,
Development,
faith,
insight,
power,
practice,
spirit,
Statehood,
truth,
value,
well being
Thursday, May 28, 2009
"Be On Your Way"
What does it mean when you speak of corporate entities or the corporate world. Does the relationship that you may or may not have with the entire world mean much to you? For most of us it only seems as if different corporate entities have little to no effect on the way we live. In the most cases we recognize general standards when it comes to being prepared/updated for the future. In actuality development starts immediately when we have the power of influence enter our lives. Some of us recognize importance of particular skills and behavior required to enter and function in most parts of society. For the most part we have an opportunity to take direction by the time we are of age to be responsible for ourselves and our behavior.
Oftentimes there are what's understood in social acceptance as outcasts/rebels. When some well textured individuals in our society protest what's either misunderstood or understood as wrong, there is knowledge supporting that individual, and reference to the civilized application of disagreement. When rebellions or social outcasts use the only means they have to speak up it's usually as crackpot as the nature of the argument they present. It doesn't mean there is medium for social icons and mutant forms to litigate. In general we are understood in survival mode, but when it comes to any form outside of socially accepted behavior to have presence and a livelihood for development it truly shows the commonality in any case. It's as if constructive means of showing concern for all that could possibly be on earth is as alien as the idea.
In casing period there are two common practices for presentation-Traditional and non-traditional. If there are means for understanding anything outside of whats traditionally understood, would that not be intermediary.
Sometimes there are immediate conflicts that surface in the presence of universal favour. Sometimes in order for us to find the origin of the matter we must take into account the nature of the existent formality. In some cases we find matters of church and state leading arguments by way of influence or forceful integrity. Hardly do we take into account the presence of mother corporate entities for resolving matters or developing solutions. Maybe on capitol hill or in the Supreme court associated matters are considered for the sake of humanity. As far as any issues on state and local level go, we are currently at odds with open discussion outside of closed door policy agreement. When any arguments of the nature have an effect on any of us, they usually have an effect on us all in some way. It might not be obvious at times, so its best to look a little a little further than issue terminology used to sum up case reports. Arguments have more than one opinion usually, and oftentimes lead to uncontrollable and chaotic behavior. No one likes to be the butt of a joke, or understood as fish out of water. Conscious living and staying in touch with the world around you could be the key to livelihood in your presence. Some people lead, some follow, and some are extremely busy staying out of the way. If you're not in part with solutions, its very easy for you to be the problem. Find your way in spirit! Find your way in the lord! However find your way! Stay up!
Oftentimes there are what's understood in social acceptance as outcasts/rebels. When some well textured individuals in our society protest what's either misunderstood or understood as wrong, there is knowledge supporting that individual, and reference to the civilized application of disagreement. When rebellions or social outcasts use the only means they have to speak up it's usually as crackpot as the nature of the argument they present. It doesn't mean there is medium for social icons and mutant forms to litigate. In general we are understood in survival mode, but when it comes to any form outside of socially accepted behavior to have presence and a livelihood for development it truly shows the commonality in any case. It's as if constructive means of showing concern for all that could possibly be on earth is as alien as the idea.
In casing period there are two common practices for presentation-Traditional and non-traditional. If there are means for understanding anything outside of whats traditionally understood, would that not be intermediary.
Sometimes there are immediate conflicts that surface in the presence of universal favour. Sometimes in order for us to find the origin of the matter we must take into account the nature of the existent formality. In some cases we find matters of church and state leading arguments by way of influence or forceful integrity. Hardly do we take into account the presence of mother corporate entities for resolving matters or developing solutions. Maybe on capitol hill or in the Supreme court associated matters are considered for the sake of humanity. As far as any issues on state and local level go, we are currently at odds with open discussion outside of closed door policy agreement. When any arguments of the nature have an effect on any of us, they usually have an effect on us all in some way. It might not be obvious at times, so its best to look a little a little further than issue terminology used to sum up case reports. Arguments have more than one opinion usually, and oftentimes lead to uncontrollable and chaotic behavior. No one likes to be the butt of a joke, or understood as fish out of water. Conscious living and staying in touch with the world around you could be the key to livelihood in your presence. Some people lead, some follow, and some are extremely busy staying out of the way. If you're not in part with solutions, its very easy for you to be the problem. Find your way in spirit! Find your way in the lord! However find your way! Stay up!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


