ABORTION; When is it ok to say when?

First of all; the matter is so sensitive, that a civilization of people that has barely "come together" for any point of character judgment, political correctness, or "a code ethics" in general is hardly able to discuss conscious matters from such diverse and altogether incoherent in nature/tribal order alongside one another.

We barely agree that we disagree, moreover we only do that to establish superficial/universal order as we all learn as children of the greatest light known to our spiritual nature (GOD, Muhammad, The Most High).

Conception is as virtuous as the life that is potentially created; better yet, we've already killed as soon as the the idea of what is living is reconsidered! Given that; at what stage of life is it to impede on growth and development, because it only seems to be when we are officially registered with the Govt., even then is our presence so that we can be considered murdered/killed before we are given what we tend to call "LIFE?" To sum it up; the killing is a conscious matter that is far from the surface matter that we address the most.

I consider myself humanist for the sake of the decisions and faults that we have and generally accept as spiritual creatures that seem to have some type of mutual respect for common hood! As superficial beings, we've created a kingdom of ill nature and falsehood while attempting to communicate. We truly have life in that kingdom, until it's taken or terribly altered... Where are the social economists when kids that just created a life start thinking of bills they can't pay? Is it then time to consider why it is of a greater consciousness to abort? Who pays then? Us? Usually, so where do we begin to change our ways? WE KILL AT ANY STAGE OF LIFE AND ACCEPT IT WHETHER WE GET CAUGHT UP IN LEGALITIES OR NOT!

Aroma Therapy!!!

See... There's this NUG right...Then, there is this freshly rolled "Indo Thai" piece...You know damn well you haven't seen a bud like it in forever... right...You already have "Killa Kushington" in your studio...Then, all of the sudden here comes "Smashius Gray" and "Juicy Bourgeoisie" ..That's a bunch of Utopia based interest before the presence of pure consciousness...right...So I'm thinkin(you know i'm thinkin riight), create an environment for Wu Lah almighty and Z ever so delightful essence to permeate the atmosphere with eternal love and favour forevermore...right...It's almost imperative that we recognize immediately, the situation at hand, and how not to neglect the care provided by the private companies/interests...Figgadeal me here...When time and essence supersedes point and purpose, well don't we run into a bit of conflict and realistic oversight of maybe the same/similar conscious beings of immortality and statehood all in the same life sentence??? If i'm just rambling...NEVERMIND, but what to make of existence beyond abstract character forgery, just above realistic intervention, right next to promise and unforgettable lines of justification...legibility??? Get at ya BOY BOY... This smoking bit may far exceed the plausibility for the rate at which allowance has purposed standards in parallel coexistence!

Where's The Beef?

      

    Why does everyone that didn't run or get elected for the office of President have the best damn plan ya ever did hear of for everythong??? I mean everything! Does one's persona have much to do with the functionality of Government? I think not! Someone had to be present in the spirit and interested to even get a look in this day and age, yet sooo many under developed citizens know the path, the journey, the truth even! Give the leaders the benefit of the doubt sometimes, and quit falling into the bogus and unorthodox gentile tempered melee that many of us find to be "CORRECTNESS," but is merely harsh criticism of the only system some have fought so hard to edify and thoroughly correct around the clock. Most of us it seems, are barely here with the generalities of order & the integrity of systematics. The rest of us are extremely satisfied that someone is in command, and could care less until the well-being of our lives is at risk. If there is a future for anyone on earth, it's most definitely the "people" who have the best plan for the "people's" well being. There is way too much campaign "PORK" and terminology war in politics to lose focus and forget the purpose for it all. What's new? If we don't find the best person for that position before I die, I think I've been shwimboozled! There is no "man" for the job! One man can't run the budget through the ceiling, and one man can't come up with a solution! If we're still on the same sh*t  3 presidents from now, as we've been on for the past few, somebody's screws are loose, and it seems to be the general population! Personally,  I AM SICK OF THIS BOGUS BULLSH*T! Someone stop the bleeding please, It's out of control and completely unruly! 

Sex: Is there a double standard for women?

A woman can love sex just as much as the next person , the conflict usually arises when sex and and the universal bond between men and women don't require the integral/mutual respect for self, others, friends, or even family! If the process to having sex was nurtured before hand most of the time, there would be less altercation and misunderstanding of one another's point and purpose in the whole otherwise promiscuous liaison! Whether or not your genitalia functions doesn't make you a man or a woman, it does justify means of reproduction often misplaced in ones spirit as far as what you may or may not hold as the highest of principle/fundamental standards in your heart. Recreational, therapeutic, occupational, and monogamous sex all seem have their place in society! It's probably best to recognize and sort your particular needs before hand and responsibly share them with your soon to be or current partner/partners or even friends and family for that matter to keep clear with those in your life the particular standards or lifestyle structure that fits your particular physical, emotional, or occupational, or monogamous needs/requirements. I think it hardly matters whether your a man or a women, but whether or not you know what your doing if at one point or another your in complete control of your actions as a responsibly mature individual!

"Nature Of Existence"

What does the the term organism mean to you? In biology organism is any living thing (such as animal, plant, fungus, or microorganism). In some way all organisms are capable of responding to stimuli, growth, development, reproduction , and maintenance as a stable whole.
However complex any organism may be, there are general requirements that these organisms must have in order to function normally. Most organisms have environmental requirements to survive.
Unlike organisms, viruses can't reproduce in the same manner. Viruses are incapable of independent reproduction and metabolism. Viruses are so common in our lives, that we must condition our minds to understand more about the way viruses have an affect on any organism. In actuality everything man has created is as simple/complex as the organism when it comes to functionality and systematics. Imagine a new gadget having capabilities beyond where spirit and the knowledge of the components used to create it intended. It almost seems as if there is an unidentified inner space that we hardly ever grasp or discuss if we do somehow consume the knowledge.
For some reason there is a plethora of knowledge before each and everyone of us that goes untapped unless we for some reason are forced to face the elements of a particular subject. It's not very often we delve into paths of education that allow us better understanding of what we seem to prioritize at least subconsciously anyhow. The patterns of understanding we've acquired along the primary years of study seem more or less preconventional. We generally accept as much education as it takes to move on to the next level. We often fall short of greatness somewhere amongst the age old traditional applications of competition. Hardly do we ever compare leaves of a tree, or life expectancy between different sized species of the same class to determine which is greater in presence. We have almost the same general interests as one another, but often differ in specific interests. Are there interest of greater concern for the sole purpose of living or the sole purpose of living in today's world?
It's convenient to most of us to play whatever seems to be popular with the majority, even if it doesn't benefit our livelihood in the slightest. If there is activity in a certain environment that does you more harm than good, can you call that a stable environment? If one to ten out of a hundred people take course that seems to be other than what the majority is taking, does it it mean someone is off course. Let's say that the characteristics of the hundred people as a whole resembles a simple organism. If you have knowledge of the organism and its characteristics, wouldn't it make sense that comparison of a single unit to billions of the same unit reflect in some way similar characteristics? There's more than likely similar conditions for the organism to even exist. Some organisms are complex in their simplicity, and may play particular roles in the functioning as a whole.
What some of us need is whats most important to us, not what others may think or suggest we need. You know best what a stable environment to grow is. Your growth is usually mentally, physically, or spiritually disturbed or halted by influence of passive or dominant constituents. It's probably best we do what we know makes sense to us if at all possible, before having to do what happens to be what a weaker or stronger influence suggests. Do you! Obey the laws of existence! Obey your livelihood! Use your insight! Promote growth! Grow in love! Grow in living!