"Nature Of Existence"

What does the the term organism mean to you? In biology organism is any living thing (such as animal, plant, fungus, or microorganism). In some way all organisms are capable of responding to stimuli, growth, development, reproduction , and maintenance as a stable whole.
However complex any organism may be, there are general requirements that these organisms must have in order to function normally. Most organisms have environmental requirements to survive.
Unlike organisms, viruses can't reproduce in the same manner. Viruses are incapable of independent reproduction and metabolism. Viruses are so common in our lives, that we must condition our minds to understand more about the way viruses have an affect on any organism. In actuality everything man has created is as simple/complex as the organism when it comes to functionality and systematics. Imagine a new gadget having capabilities beyond where spirit and the knowledge of the components used to create it intended. It almost seems as if there is an unidentified inner space that we hardly ever grasp or discuss if we do somehow consume the knowledge.
For some reason there is a plethora of knowledge before each and everyone of us that goes untapped unless we for some reason are forced to face the elements of a particular subject. It's not very often we delve into paths of education that allow us better understanding of what we seem to prioritize at least subconsciously anyhow. The patterns of understanding we've acquired along the primary years of study seem more or less preconventional. We generally accept as much education as it takes to move on to the next level. We often fall short of greatness somewhere amongst the age old traditional applications of competition. Hardly do we ever compare leaves of a tree, or life expectancy between different sized species of the same class to determine which is greater in presence. We have almost the same general interests as one another, but often differ in specific interests. Are there interest of greater concern for the sole purpose of living or the sole purpose of living in today's world?
It's convenient to most of us to play whatever seems to be popular with the majority, even if it doesn't benefit our livelihood in the slightest. If there is activity in a certain environment that does you more harm than good, can you call that a stable environment? If one to ten out of a hundred people take course that seems to be other than what the majority is taking, does it it mean someone is off course. Let's say that the characteristics of the hundred people as a whole resembles a simple organism. If you have knowledge of the organism and its characteristics, wouldn't it make sense that comparison of a single unit to billions of the same unit reflect in some way similar characteristics? There's more than likely similar conditions for the organism to even exist. Some organisms are complex in their simplicity, and may play particular roles in the functioning as a whole.
What some of us need is whats most important to us, not what others may think or suggest we need. You know best what a stable environment to grow is. Your growth is usually mentally, physically, or spiritually disturbed or halted by influence of passive or dominant constituents. It's probably best we do what we know makes sense to us if at all possible, before having to do what happens to be what a weaker or stronger influence suggests. Do you! Obey the laws of existence! Obey your livelihood! Use your insight! Promote growth! Grow in love! Grow in living!